Codecov Report

Attention: 107 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (d03785d) 68.59% compared to head (a574117) 60.70%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #116      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.59%   60.70%   -7.89%     
==========================================
  Files          27       18       -9     
  Lines        2124     1438     -686     
==========================================
- Hits         1457      873     -584     
+ Misses        592      506      -86     
+ Partials       75       59      -16     

I am okay with codecov propblems. We should rip it out anyhow.

Hi @faddat , thank you for the benchmarks and insights. As @adizere stated, we don't want to abruptly remove support for all other databases as we have a very large userbase still using them. We have plans to converge to one DB backend in the future but this requires an extensive study on what users are using. I would therefore separate the concerns of adding Pebble and removing other backends and keep in the PR only the addition of Pebble.

ok, I will change this to draft in that case.

Just so you know, somebody has written a universal converter. I just don't know who. It may have been The team that starts on a p but isn't persistence but I always forget their name

personally I dont care about tenths of a percent of on codecov. Please let me know if it matters.

I think that this PR remains a good idea.

The PR would be a lot better without this commit a574117. It's difficult to review right now. Can you revert that commit?

100%

closing in favor of #115